Those who talk about bondage and liberation are only talking about Prakriti (nature of illusion).
![amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IqRzbk_7epQ/maxresdefault.jpg)
#Amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj free
"He is free for a moment and gets bound the next moment", means he has not understood at all, what is Brahman. Even God Brahma or other gods will never become liberated, if they remain in body consciousness. If one continues to remain in body consciousness, one will never be liberated. He understands "This is the self - I am Brahman" and stays thus. When the consciousness stirs back then again he comes to body consciousness. To be motionless or to be unconscious is to do with the body. If some one gets the "experience" (of Self) all of a sudden then he becomes quiet. Apart from thes two there is Nitya mukta, the Absolute. They do not care about what they eat or drink. Videha mukta means those that have understood and have indentified with Brahman and just remain as they are. Jeevan mukta refers to those persons who are fully conscious as to what they are and yet perform their worldly duties. In the category of libration there are three compartments, namely, Realised ones have done utmost efforts in order to save the world. If a realised person becomes motionless then who will give the knowledge? Knowledge of final reality is obtained through the teaching of the Master.
![amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj](https://www.baps.org/Data/Sites/1/Media/GalleryImages/21711/WebImages/2020_02_17_036_Atladara.jpg)
If that is so, then how can this work be done if one is motionless?īecause one gives sermons does it mean he is not realised? How can you say he has not not reached Final Reality? To be motionless does not mean becoming a realised person. Then how could Shuka tell Bhagwat to King Parikshita? It is necessary to put forward various versions and say things clearly when one (the Master) gives sermons. If remaining motionless like a log of wood means being Brahman, then Shuka and Vamadeva would be like dead bodies. Then how did they write mythological books? Suppose we accept to mean "Mukta"or "being free" means remaining motionless. Is self-realisation means remaining actionless? In that case when formerly King Janaka ruled a kingdom even after self-realisation was everything lost? Shuka (a great saint) and others had also realised the self. The problem of bondage and liberation arises only because man, enveloped in ignorance, takes the body as his self and also takes the "doership" of all his actions to himself. Thought of Liberation and bondage are present only during the state of ignorance.
![amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj amrut laya shri siddharameshwar maharaj](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-PN_N-CTwTX8/WLLtxmmoPJI/AAAAAAAAAfY/IVSOpVEjWyQQZSW5DNFdZv9cTE2INklHACEw/s1600/12.InchageriGrace.jpg)
"Thought of Liberation and bondage is present only during the state of Ignorance.